Hysteria Over Trump Accepting Election Results Upended by History of Democrats Not Accepting Election Results

Share this article!

Trump, never one to cower in front of or soothe to a media hungry for rhetoric and scandal, addressed ambivalently, as just he should in the face of such an unreasonable question.”I have to see. Look, you– I need to see,” Trump said. “No, Im not going to simply state yes. Im not going to say no.” Obviously, the president will accept defeat ought to that come to pass in November. The precedent for him doing otherwise doesnt exist. The audacity of asking such a concern is based on nothing but radical guesswork and conspiracy-mongering from Trumps political opponents.Additionally, Trump has currently been through this specific cycle. In late October of 2016, just 2 weeks ahead of the basic election, he was asked if he would accept defeat by his challenger Hillary Clinton. As The New York Times said at the time, Trump threw the very concept of democracy into concern with his flippant, tongue-in-cheek action.”In a remarkable declaration that seemed to cast doubt on American democracy, Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he might decline the outcomes of next months election if he felt it was rigged against him– a stand that Hillary Clinton blasted as scary at their caustic and final dispute on Wednesday.”Indeed, the 2016 Democratic governmental candidate did reveal horror at Trumps remark that he would just accept the outcome of the election the following month if he were the victor. The two weeks in between that dispute and Election Day were perforated with media conjecture about what a despondent, failed, Donald Trump would do should he need to cede the presidency to Clinton.Those treacherous forecasts were immediately memory-holed when Trump seized the election on that stunning evening in November. Hillarys actions, nevertheless, were far more like those she found so “terrible” only two weeks early.Mrs. Clinton did at first, begrudgingly yield the election to President Trump, but pivoted quickly into blaming the Russians for taking the election from her, stating she had actually run a fair project and was cheated out of a triumph she felt was hers. As Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist explained, nevertheless, thats not what occurred.”Really stunning to hear her say that she ran an excellent project and that the Russians stole it from her,” Hemingway said. “I believe somebody requires to sit down and have a frank discussion about the fact she did lose. She did not run a great campaign and that the Russians did not steal that election.”Clinton has actually likewise blamed the presence of the Electoral College for her defeat, repeatedly keeping in mind that she won the popular vote. Browsing for other scapegoats for her stunning defeat on that eventful night in 2016, Clinton has variously cast blame on her Democratic challenger Senator Bernie Sanders and previous President Barack Obama.After all the hemming and hawing about her defeat, nevertheless, the previous very first lady and secretary of state said in a current interview that she didnt think Trump would “go quietly” ought to he lose to Joe Biden in November.”Well, I believe it is a reasonable point to raise regarding whether, if he loses, hes going to go quietly or not,” Clinton said last week. “And we need to be ready for that. “Clintons remarks and refusal to accept the results of her election were echoed by prospects in the 2018 election cycle. Democrat Stacey Abrams of Georgia declined to confess that she had actually relatively been defeated by Republican Brian Kemp.”I lawfully acknowledge that Brian Kemp secured an adequate variety of votes under our existing system to end up being the governor of Georgia,” Abrams said in April of in 2015. “I do not yield that the procedure appertained, nor do I condone that procedure.” Abrams has actually never yielded nor accepted the results of that election.Clinton and Abrams rejection of election outcomes is absolutely nothing new for Republicans looking for the White House. Both elections that yielded 8 years of George W. Bush as leader of the nation were fiercely objected to for years, even years after the last tallies were counted.So, for every single hand-wringing member of the media and the Democratic legislators on Capitol Hill persuaded they will need to eliminate a beat Trump with a crowbar from the White House this November: do not count your chickens prior to they hatch. However, they may want to practice accepting reality themselves and perhaps write an outline of their concession speeches.This material was originally published here.

“In a remarkable statement that seemed to cast doubt on American democracy, Donald J. Trump stated Wednesday that he might not accept the results of next months election if he felt it was rigged against him– a stand that Hillary Clinton blasted as terrible at their caustic and last dispute on Wednesday.”Indeed, the 2016 Democratic presidential prospect did express scary at Trumps remark that he would only accept the result of the election the following month if he were the victor. The 2 weeks in between that dispute and Election Day were perforated with media opinion about what a despondent, failed, Donald Trump would do must he have to deliver the presidency to Clinton.Those dangerous forecasts were instantly memory-holed when Trump seized the election on that spectacular night in November. Clinton did initially, begrudgingly concede the election to President Trump, however rotated quickly into blaming the Russians for taking the election from her, stating she had run a fair campaign and was cheated out of a victory she felt was hers.”Clintons remarks and rejection to accept the results of her election were echoed by candidates in the 2018 election cycle.